| |||||||
| General Forum for general World War 2 talk. Anything about WW2 that doesn't fit in any other category |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4
![]() | Would the outcome of the war be the same? I know a lot of German-Jewish scientists left Germany in the 30s because of Hitler. Would we (Allies) would have won if Hitler embraced Germany's Jewish scientists? Considering that they could have made the atom bomb before we did. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: England
Posts: 221
![]() | Even if the Jewish scientists who worked on the project in America had remained in Germany, you would have to suppose they would be willing to continue their work to produce a weapon for offensive aggression? Also, many of Germany's scientists were Scandinavian and quite a few came and/or escaped to Britain during the nazis regime. Oppenheimer was Jewish, but he was American and only studied for a while in Germany in the 1920's. Two things are undoubtable however, IMHO, 1. that Hitler would have used the bomb if he had it, and 2. the Germans were not that advanced and I'm not sure how much of a 'passion' Hitler seriously had to develop this theoretical weapon? Certainly the hardware that was brought to Germany after successful espionage in Norway, was found abandoned and unassembled after the war in southern Germany. In respect of German Jewish citizens, they would of course have been beneficial to the National effort if they had been allowed to. One image of the lunacy is surely German citizens being rounded-up with men producing their service records and decorations from W.W.I???? If Hitler had developed the Atom Bomb before going to war, it would have been a very different conflict. If Hitler made no issue with Jews and they were otherwise part of their war effort, Germany would still have lost. No.9 |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Very Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Newark, NJ, and Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 2,443
![]() | Quote:
I'm mostly of the "intentionalist" view of the Holocaust, which argues that Hitler intended to kill every Jew in Europe. The "Functionalist" view is that killing Jews was part of Hitler's programs, not the overriding concern. There is validity to both views, and I think that both were going on at the same time. But I cannot see Hitler -- despite him granting "honorary Aryan" status to a number of German Jews and "Mischlinge" -- supporting Jewish atomic bomb scientists. He did not believe the bomb would work. He thought it would incinerate the entire atmosphere, which was a concern held by Enrico Fermi, as well. Nor was Hitler a fan of science in particular. He had little interest in the V-weapons until, after repeated failed launches, Braun and Dornberger showed him a film of a test launch that worked. Hitler then saw the terror and propaganda purposes of such a weapon. Possibly if the atomic scientists could do a similar demonstration for Hitler, he would have supported the bomb.
__________________ "My intensity is intense." -- Roger Clemens "We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender." -- Winston Churchill. "I am not a hero. The heroes are all dead. I am a survivor." -- Sgt. William Guarnere, Easy Company, 506th Parachute Regiment, 101st Airborne Division. Check out my little contributions to World War II history at my web pages: World War II Plus 55 or http://davidhlippman.wildbillguarnere.com | |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 168
![]() | That wouldn't have been possible. It was one of the planks of Nazi popular support. Their whole character would've had to be different. The Nazi policy of repression of 'inferior' races was the main reason their enemies fought them with such commitment. If they hadn't been as bad as they were, they mayn't have had the gall to invade Poland in the first place. You might just as well consider whether tigers would've done better if they didn't bite... [img]images/smilies/default/biggrin.gif[/img] Regards, MikB |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 780
![]() | But I cannot see Hitler -- despite him granting "honorary Aryan" status to a number of German Jews and "Mischlinge" -- supporting Jewish atomic bomb scientists. He did not believe the bomb would work. He thought it would incinerate the entire atmosphere, which was a concern held by Enrico Fermi, as well. It's ironic that Hitler's personal doctor/ surgeon was Jewish, but he was never removed because Hitler valued him so highly! |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Junior Member ![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 14
![]() | 2 things (1) The Jewish scientists would still of had to have worked in the chaotic and disorganised R & D conditions prevalent in Nazi Germany therefore reducing their chances of success considerably. (2) After a couple of British instigated attacks on the Norweign Norsk- Hydro plant, which manufactured the only Nazi source of heavy water necessary to research/build a bomb, the Nazi decided it was an unsafe location and tried to ship all of the equipment back to Germany. A Norweign saboteur, under British orders, blew up the ferry carrying the equipment and the heavy water on its way back to Germany thereby ending any hope that the Nazis had of making an atomic bomb. Jewish scientists would in all likelyhood have made no difference to Nazi atomic research in the long run. No heavy water = no atomic bomb. Last edited by Rabbieburns; 21-02-2006 at 11:28 AM. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| I Like Tanks. ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Perfidious Albion.
Posts: 7,682
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Nonetheless, a large Proportion of the key figures on the Manhattan project were emigre Jews from Germany and it's occupied territories, Teller, Frisch, Bloch et. al. Who could say what Brains like that could come up with? I can't deny the integral nature of Nazism and anti-semitism and its relationship to the war but this is one of those 'what if?' questions and Hitler certainly removed a crucial science knowledge base that could, conceivably, have handed him a weapon he wouldnt have hesitated to use. I can easily imagine huge swathes of Eastern Europe still being Damaged wastelands now. Last edited by von Poop; 21-02-2006 at 10:33 AM. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Connecticut
Posts: 167
![]() | Quote:
__________________ "Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning." -Erwin Rommel | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 312
![]() | Quote:
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERheisenberg.htm A friend of mine who has a science degree says that Heisenberg is still very highly regarded in the scientific world. Reverting to the original question, anti-Semitism was so key to Hitler that I don't think that you can have a scenario where he embraces the German Jewish population. What might be more plausible is if he didn't rise to power but a more traditional right wing nationalist leader did. Such a leader might have followed a similar foreign policy to Hitler but without the anti-Semitism
__________________ Martin | |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| THE WAFFEN-SS: Divisional Service History, Brigade/Battalion Unit List + Unit Notes. | Christos | Axis Units | 74 | 30-05-2008 10:42 PM |
| Hitler to lose German citizenship? | Andy in West Oz | World War II News Articles | 15 | 15-03-2007 07:08 PM |
| The Reich's Ex-leaders Explain Why They Were Beaten | spidge | General | 11 | 10-11-2006 12:51 PM |
| German Flying Saucers (Nazi UFOS) | Panzerfaust | Weapons, Technology & Equipment | 86 | 06-03-2006 08:33 PM |