World War 2 TalkCalendarContact Us

Go Back   World War 2 Talk > Main WW2 Talk Forum > Theatres of War > NW Europe

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30-03-2005, 04:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Belaya Smjert
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Suomi, Finland/Sweden
Posts: 8
Belaya Smjert is on a distinguished road
Here are some photos from the continuation war..i hope that the picture
aren’t to big
Best regards
Belaya Smjert

Machine gun M/09 Maxim




flamethrower





Advancing





Happy Russian POW

Belaya Smjert is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2005, 10:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
smc66
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 84
smc66 is an unknown quantity at this point
Out of interest what is your view on the Continuation War? Should Finland have joined in with the German invasion of the Soviet Union?
__________________
BESSIE BRADDOCK: Winston you are drunk.
WINSTON CHURCHILL: Mrs Braddock you are ugly, but in the morning I will be sober.
smc66 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2005, 06:30 AM   #3 (permalink)
Belaya Smjert
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Suomi, Finland/Sweden
Posts: 8
Belaya Smjert is on a distinguished road
We wanted the territorial losses back from the winter war and also the extending the territory further east to protect the people living in East-Karelia .so if you ask me the war where right. But remember the goals off the war where not to marsh to Moscow with the Germans ..
Best regards
Belaya Smjert
Belaya Smjert is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2005, 06:38 AM   #4 (permalink)
Glosters
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 46
Glosters is an unknown quantity at this point
The Finns didn't invade the Soviet Union. They retook the Finnish land stolen by the Soviets in the Winter War. Mannerheim refused Hitler's requests to push into Russia or to join the siege of Leningrad. The only Russian land occupied was where local geography offered the Finnish Army a better defensive line for the expected counter-attacks. The Finns position was fully understood by Churchill who sent a personal message to Mannerheim regretting that as a Russian ally against Germany, Britain would be forced to declare war on Finland.

Unfortunately for Finland, they were victims of Stalin's aggression and he was allowed to get away with it.

Steve
Glosters is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2005, 12:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
smc66
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 84
smc66 is an unknown quantity at this point
Actually having studied the Foreign Office papers on the British declaration of war on Finland the British were not as understanding as you make out. Basically, the British were torn in their relations between supporting a democratic country and disabusing a blatantly pro-German foreign policy. Though there was a rservoir of goodwill between the countries, British relations with Finland had been growing colder throughout 1941 and they were not particularly keen on the transit agreements Finland made with the Germans. Initial British reactions were to try and get Finland out of it, when this wasn't forthcoming, Churchill instructed the Foreign Office to be pretty stiff with them, and when Mannerheim issued his order of the day on 10 July Churchill wrote 'In view of the obnoxious and aggressive attitude of Finland, I trust we have already seized all their ships and subjected the Finns to every inconvenience in our power." (PRO PREM 3/170/4 16 July 1941, Churchill note to Eden). On 30 July 1941 the British bombed German transports in Petsamo and Liinnehamari harbours and the Finns broke off diplomatic relations.

The declaration of war in December 1941 came about due to Soviet pressure though Churchill had originally suggested it to Stalin, "We will declare war upon them should they continue beyond the old frontiers." (PRO PREM 3/170/1 4 September 1941 Churchill note to Stalin). Churchill's personal note to Mannerheim was a last ditch attempt to pull Finland out of the war, but the reply he received was little more than a least of greivances.

The bit about Finnish military only advancing strategically is a bit of a myth too. Yes they did have one eye on possible Allied reactions to their advance and reacted accordingly, however, German troops were allowed to use Finnish territory to invade the Soviet Union; advances in East Karelia were designed to try and reach the Murmansk railway and Mannerheim did promise to join the German army on the River Svir; Finally the Finnish government did stage manage at Voukkineimi on 20 July 1942 a meeting of Karelians who wished to be united with Finland. This is what the British took umbrage too.
__________________
BESSIE BRADDOCK: Winston you are drunk.
WINSTON CHURCHILL: Mrs Braddock you are ugly, but in the morning I will be sober.
smc66 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2005, 09:40 PM   #6 (permalink)
aetheling
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1
aetheling is an unknown quantity at this point
Perhaps the question should be what choice did Finland have but to fight the continuation war. Finland's desire was to remain neutral but The Soviet Unions attack in 1939 made that position impossible. If Finland allied themselves with the England, the USA, and the Soviet Union they would have become occupied like Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, under the guise of soviet protection. Neutrality was not an option because Stalin would not have it. The third option of joining the axis was the lesser of three evils. It afforded the opportunity to take back the land that they rightly felt was stolen from. (How would Americans feel if they had to cede California to Japan and relocate the entire popuation of that state in a matter of weeks, and allow for Japan to have bases in Maryland, and Florida). Plus Germany was willing to provide desperately needed food and raw materials, and military aid in quantities sufficient to help, something the west did only in greatly appreciated but merely token amounts in 1939.
aetheling is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2005, 10:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
hunter07
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 15
hunter07 is an unknown quantity at this point
To my understanding Russia started the war against Finland for two reasons.
1. To establish defensive possition in case Germany decided to invade Russia from Finland. Stain was not a complete idiot, he knew that the war against Germany was coming.
2. Russia wanted to test out its new military strategies, which by the way, obviously did not work.

I agree that Finland had the right to the territory that it lost during the 1939 war but to join Nazi Germany in its conquest, in my opinion, was a moral mistake.
hunter07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2005, 05:34 PM   #8 (permalink)
smc66
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 84
smc66 is an unknown quantity at this point
I'm not sure the Finns would have gone the way of the Baltics. The setting up of the puppet Kuusinen government two days after the Winter War began suggests that Finland may have gone the way of eastern Europe between 1945-48 rather than lose their independence completely. Then again when they did have the oppotunity to do this in 1948 the Soviets took the 'Finlandisation' route instead.

Yes, Finnish choices were limited but they still took choices themselves that moved them into the orbit of the Germans and it is this the British objected to.
__________________
BESSIE BRADDOCK: Winston you are drunk.
WINSTON CHURCHILL: Mrs Braddock you are ugly, but in the morning I will be sober.
smc66 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2005, 02:09 PM   #9 (permalink)
Kiwiwriter
Very Senior Member
 
Kiwiwriter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Newark, NJ, and Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 2,443
Kiwiwriter is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by smc66@Jun 11 2005, 12:34 PM
I'm not sure the Finns would have gone the way of the Baltics. The setting up of the puppet Kuusinen government two days after the Winter War began suggests that Finland may have gone the way of eastern Europe between 1945-48 rather than lose their independence completely. Then again when they did have the oppotunity to do this in 1948 the Soviets took the 'Finlandisation' route instead.

Yes, Finnish choices were limited but they still took choices themselves that moved them into the orbit of the Germans and it is this the British objected to.
The "Kuusinen Government" was set up in Terijoki, a seaside resort just north of Leningrad, and the Soviets insisted they would only negotiate peace with that state. However, in March 1940, they jettisoned Kuusinen, an American-born Finn (like much of the CPUSA leadership), and he vanished back into deserved obscurity.
__________________
"My intensity is intense." -- Roger Clemens

"We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender." -- Winston Churchill.

"I am not a hero. The heroes are all dead. I am a survivor." -- Sgt. William Guarnere, Easy Company, 506th Parachute Regiment, 101st Airborne Division.

Check out my little contributions to World War II history at my web pages:

World War II Plus 55

or

http://davidhlippman.wildbillguarnere.com
Kiwiwriter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-06-2005, 06:46 AM   #10 (permalink)
nolanbuc
Senior Member
 
nolanbuc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Mississippi
Posts: 223
nolanbuc is on a distinguished road
I have always found the Continuation War to be a curious sort of paradox in the story of WWII. It is interesting how the Western democracies chose to handle this issue, since they obviously had to be sympathetic to the Finns cause, but had their hands tied to aid the enemy of a vital ally.

As for the Finns themselves, allying with the enemy of an enemy in a struggle for survival vs. the USSR was perhaps a moral mistake, but a practical neccesity. As has been stated here, they did not join the Germans in the seige of Stalingrad, and they were not in a war of conquest.

One question, however: while I realize that the Finns were not Fascists, is it clear whether they fully understood the depth of the Nazis depravity at the time?

Thanks for sharing the great pictures, BTW!
__________________
(my avatar is Sgt. Bill R. "Buck" Buchanan, USMC Pacific Theater...or grandad to me)

"All right, they're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us... they can't get away this time."
- Lieutenant General Lewis B."Chesty" Puller, USMC

World Sports Talk Forum
nolanbuc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Irish Guards, 3 Bn. War Diary, June 1944 - dbf Unit Documents 98 12-10-2008 04:33 PM
Boer War Stuff dbf Prewar 29 21-07-2008 10:20 AM
War Graves in UK dbf War Grave Photographs 33 25-06-2008 06:25 PM
THE WAFFEN-SS: Divisional Service History, Brigade/Battalion Unit List + Unit Notes. Christos Axis Units 74 30-05-2008 10:42 PM
The MEDITERRANEAN WAR AT SEA: Strategic Campaign Analysis. Christos North Africa & the Med 26 08-12-2007 01:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:58 PM.
vBSkinworks


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0