| |||||||
| The War In The Air Aerial warfare in the period. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Discharged Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Perth
Posts: 242
![]() | Psychological effects of aerial bombing Psychological Effects of Air Operations Against Strategic Targets In all major conflicts from World War II on, the United States has attacked what have been termed strategic targets, including targets near or within the enemy's capital city, to reduce the enemy's physical capacity to wage war. At the same time, these and other strategic attacks have also aimed to produce psychological effects. Among other objectives, the strategic air operations have sought to force enemy governments to halt their aggression and withdraw their forces from friendly territory, negotiate a truce or peace agreement, or capitulate. Air operations have also endeavored to generate internal opposition to the enemy government's war effort and, in at least one instance, to precipitate the enemy government's overthrow. The experiences of past conflicts suggest that, while U.S. air attacks on strategic targets can provide important coercive leverage on an enemy, such attacks by themselves are unlikely to secure U.S. war aims. To force an opponent to capitulate or negotiate an end to a conflict, the United States and its allies also must be able to convince the enemy leadership that its deployed forces will face defeat or, at best, stalemate if the fighting continues. Because the enemy's decisions about war termination will depend heavily on his perception of the likely battlefield outcome, U.S. air planners should consider enemy deployed forces a strategic target. Air attacks on strategic targets in World War II generally fell short of producing the psychological results their planners hoped for. This was particularly true of Germany, where the Allied bombing of cities failed to deny labor to German industry. The psychological effects of the Allied bombing did speed Japan's decision to surrender and helped shape Italy's decision to seek a peace accord. However, in neither instance was the Allied bombing the sole cause for the enemy decision to terminate hostilities, as the deployed forces of both Axis powers had experienced repeated defeats. Last edited by The Aviator; 03-12-2007 at 08:20 AM. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Old Hickory Recon Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: American by birth, Southern by the grace of God
Posts: 2,094
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would hazard a bet that aerial bombing was fairly successful in 1991. Ground troops in the field surrendering to aircraft would, to me, be indicative of a successful air bombardment campaign.
__________________ Warmest Regards, Jeff The Bonnie Blue Flag |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Carpet Bombing | strangelove | NW Europe | 61 | 20-02-2012 04:59 PM |
| Lancaster Fitted With H2s | Chris Basey | The War In The Air | 16 | 13-02-2012 05:13 PM |
| Dresden: barbarism and vengeance | T-34 | General | 151 | 06-09-2010 02:16 PM |
| The Reich's Ex-leaders Explain Why They Were Beaten | spidge | General | 15 | 12-07-2009 08:28 PM |
| New book on bombing of Germany | Kyt | Books, Films, TV, Radio | 1 | 14-01-2007 02:17 PM |