| |||||||
| Weapons, Technology & Equipment From entrenching tools to radar, and all points between. |
| View Poll Results: Which of these British Tanks is your favourite and why | |||
| Cromwell | | 3 | 7.89% |
| Matilda MKII | | 5 | 13.16% |
| Churchill | | 17 | 44.74% |
| comet | | 12 | 31.58% |
| centaur | | 1 | 2.63% |
| Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 260
![]() | I have always thought the epitome of British tank design, that is one reflecting the character of the British people and boffins in general, is the Light Tank Mk VI. Here we have a vehicle obviously built with bits of other vehicles and some original parts in a shed in someone's garden. What better could possibly represent how Britain has done technical things in the 20th century? |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
![]() | Quote:
Using 4/3 pi r cubed and 7.8 gm/cc, an iron roundshot in 57mm would weigh about a pound and two-thirds. Regards, MikB | |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) |
| The Dixie Division ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Not far enough in the woods
Posts: 1,624
![]() ![]() ![]() | I understood that the size of a gun in "pounds" derived it's name from the weight of a spherical iron ball that would fit into the gun and was a holdover from the days of sail, when the actually projectile did weigh a given amount. In modern times, it actually had nothing to do with weight of the actual projectile used. Thusly, a round solid ball of iron, 57mm in diameter would weigh approximately 6 pounds and a 40mm, 2 pounds, etc. Am I incorrect in this assumption? Math and I are not good friends. |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
![]() | Quote:
Regards, MikB | |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
![]() | ...Or to add another example:- 24-pounder naval guns of Nelson's day used a roundshot of approx. 5.8" diameter. 25-pounder gun/howitzers of WW2 used a shell weighing about 25 lb. and 3.45" in diameter across the driving bands (so the body would be a bit less - maybe 3.35" or so). Regards, MikB |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| The Dixie Division ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Not far enough in the woods
Posts: 1,624
![]() ![]() ![]() | I have been searching long and hard trying to find a source for my assumption about the bore size. I found this one in Wikipeida, but will continue to look for another. I was incorrect, according to this, in that is was weight in lead not iron. "This leads to certain guns being referred to as 6-pounder, 25-pounder and so forth. However this relationship between calibre and projectile weight changed with the introduction of the cylindrical rifled shell. The gun continued to be named by the weight of projectile it threw although this no longer gave a direct indication of the barrel size" Caliber - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) | |
| The Dixie Division ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Not far enough in the woods
Posts: 1,624
![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
I found this: 6-pdr data Calibre 57mm/2.24in Shot type Shell Weight (kg/lb.) HE 2.7/6 AP 2.7/6 APCBC 3.2/7 APCR 1.8/4 APDS 1.5/3.2 I'm going to move on since this is a thread about favorite UK tanks. Maybe the moderators will transfer this to another thread. | |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 108
![]() | Back to topic: Why was the Crusader not included in the poll? I voted for the Matilda, but I though that they proved to be problematic during the defence of Greece? Although the pdr to diameter conversion is definitely an intersting topic |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
![]() | Quote:
Yes, I agree Crusader was an omission. nothing looked more impressive with sand pouring from its tracks, bounding across the desert. Fritz appears to have thought more of it than our own chaps did. Regards, MikB | |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) | |
| Top Moose ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Under the stairs
Posts: 9,304
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
![]() I love this photo. Best of British , eh? No namby-pamby PC council going to tell him to take that flag down. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Boer War Stuff | dbf | Prewar | 29 | 21-07-2008 11:20 AM |
| Public Tanks | von Poop | WW2 Museums. Events, & places to see. | 31 | 13-05-2008 01:08 AM |
| Camouflage of Soviet Tanks | spidge | Weapons, Technology & Equipment | 5 | 15-09-2006 11:22 PM |
| The NIH in Italy - Part One- At War | Wise1 | North Irish Horse | 0 | 22-07-2006 01:15 AM |
| Indian Headgear | simonclarkson | Burma & India | 4 | 22-04-2006 06:07 AM |