World War 2 TalkCalendarContact Us

Go Back   World War 2 Talk > Main WW2 Talk Forum > Weapons, Technology & Equipment

Weapons, Technology & Equipment From entrenching tools to radar, and all points between.

View Poll Results: Which of these British Tanks is your favourite and why
Cromwell 3 7.89%
Matilda MKII 5 13.16%
Churchill 17 44.74%
comet 12 31.58%
centaur 1 2.63%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2007, 10:06 PM   #21 (permalink)
T. A. Gardner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 260
T. A. Gardner is on a distinguished road
I have always thought the epitome of British tank design, that is one reflecting the character of the British people and boffins in general, is the Light Tank Mk VI. Here we have a vehicle obviously built with bits of other vehicles and some original parts in a shed in someone's garden. What better could possibly represent how Britain has done technical things in the 20th century?
T. A. Gardner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 11:05 PM   #22 (permalink)
MikB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
MikB will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slipdigit View Post
On an aside, when did the UK quit using spherical projectile weight equivalents (for lack of a better term) for gun size and start using bore diameter itself when descibing large guns? e.g. 6 pdr for a 57mm gun?
'Twasn't spherical equivalent, 'twas actual. A 6 pdr A/T gun threw a 6 lb. shot in APCBC.

Using 4/3 pi r cubed and 7.8 gm/cc, an iron roundshot in 57mm would weigh about a pound and two-thirds.

Regards,
MikB
MikB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:02 AM   #23 (permalink)
Slipdigit
The Dixie Division
 
Slipdigit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Not far enough in the woods
Posts: 1,624
Slipdigit is a jewel in the roughSlipdigit is a jewel in the roughSlipdigit is a jewel in the rough
I understood that the size of a gun in "pounds" derived it's name from the weight of a spherical iron ball that would fit into the gun and was a holdover from the days of sail, when the actually projectile did weigh a given amount. In modern times, it actually had nothing to do with weight of the actual projectile used. Thusly, a round solid ball of iron, 57mm in diameter would weigh approximately 6 pounds and a 40mm, 2 pounds, etc.

Am I incorrect in this assumption? Math and I are not good friends.
__________________
Warmest Regards,
Jeff



The Bonnie Blue Flag

Slipdigit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 09:03 AM   #24 (permalink)
MikB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
MikB will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slipdigit View Post
I understood that the size of a gun in "pounds" derived it's name from the weight of a spherical iron ball that would fit into the gun and was a holdover from the days of sail, when the actually projectile did weigh a given amount. In modern times, it actually had nothing to do with weight of the actual projectile used. Thusly, a round solid ball of iron, 57mm in diameter would weigh approximately 6 pounds and a 40mm, 2 pounds, etc.

Am I incorrect in this assumption? Math and I are not good friends.
No, not correct! The long, pointy APCBC that the 57mm 6 pdr was originally designed to fire really did weigh 6 lb.! A 57mm roundshot really would weigh 1.66 lb .! The 13 pdr, 18 pdr, 17 pdr, 20 pdr guns really were so called after the actual (approx) weight of their actual projectiles. I don't know how to make it any clearer... and I'm not gonna work out all their roundshot weights. I can do the maths, but it hurts for me too...

Regards,
MikB
MikB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 11:23 AM   #25 (permalink)
MikB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
MikB will become famous soon enough
...Or to add another example:-

24-pounder naval guns of Nelson's day used a roundshot of approx. 5.8" diameter.

25-pounder gun/howitzers of WW2 used a shell weighing about 25 lb. and 3.45" in diameter across the driving bands (so the body would be a bit less - maybe 3.35" or so).

Regards,
MikB
MikB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 06:24 PM   #26 (permalink)
Slipdigit
The Dixie Division
 
Slipdigit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Not far enough in the woods
Posts: 1,624
Slipdigit is a jewel in the roughSlipdigit is a jewel in the roughSlipdigit is a jewel in the rough
I have been searching long and hard trying to find a source for my assumption about the bore size. I found this one in Wikipeida, but will continue to look for another. I was incorrect, according to this, in that is was weight in lead not iron.

"This leads to certain guns being referred to as 6-pounder, 25-pounder and so forth. However this relationship between calibre and projectile weight changed with the introduction of the cylindrical rifled shell. The gun continued to be named by the weight of projectile it threw although this no longer gave a direct indication of the barrel size"

Caliber - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Warmest Regards,
Jeff



The Bonnie Blue Flag

Slipdigit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 06:47 PM   #27 (permalink)
Slipdigit
The Dixie Division
 
Slipdigit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Not far enough in the woods
Posts: 1,624
Slipdigit is a jewel in the roughSlipdigit is a jewel in the roughSlipdigit is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
The long, pointy APCBC that the 57mm 6 pdr was originally designed to fire really did weigh 6 lb.!
On this page: Artillery Equipment page
I found this:
6-pdr data
Calibre 57mm/2.24in
Shot type Shell Weight (kg/lb.)
HE 2.7/6
AP 2.7/6
APCBC 3.2/7
APCR 1.8/4
APDS 1.5/3.2

I'm going to move on since this is a thread about favorite UK tanks. Maybe the moderators will transfer this to another thread.
__________________
Warmest Regards,
Jeff



The Bonnie Blue Flag

Slipdigit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 08:35 PM   #28 (permalink)
Desert Dog
Senior Member
 
Desert Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 108
Desert Dog is on a distinguished road
Back to topic: Why was the Crusader not included in the poll?

I voted for the Matilda, but I though that they proved to be problematic during the defence of Greece?

Although the pdr to diameter conversion is definitely an intersting topic
Desert Dog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 10:57 PM   #29 (permalink)
MikB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 170
MikB will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slipdigit View Post

6-pdr data
Calibre 57mm/2.24in
Shot type Shell Weight (kg/lb.)
...
AP 2.7/6
APCBC 3.2/7
...
OK, I stand corrected there; it was the original vanilla AP projectile that weighed 6 lb. I had thought that 6pdrs started out with APCBC because they were introduced after Fritz had started case-hardening his armour. There are other figures there, such a APDS shot weight, where I've seen different numbers - but my excuse is that books are still in storage...

Yes, I agree Crusader was an omission. nothing looked more impressive with sand pouring from its tracks, bounding across the desert. Fritz appears to have thought more of it than our own chaps did.

Regards,
MikB
MikB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2007, 12:55 AM   #30 (permalink)
Owen
Top Moose
 
Owen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Under the stairs
Posts: 9,304
Owen is a name known to allOwen is a name known to allOwen is a name known to allOwen is a name known to allOwen is a name known to allOwen is a name known to all
Quote:
Bombardier Wilson of 5th Royal Horse Artillery, 7th Armoured Division, uses a Cromwell observation post tank to show off the Union Flag that he carried throughout the north-west Europe campaign, 10 May 1945.



I love this photo.
Best of British , eh?
No namby-pamby PC council going to tell him to take that flag down.
Owen is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boer War Stuff dbf Prewar 29 21-07-2008 11:20 AM
Public Tanks von Poop WW2 Museums. Events, & places to see. 31 13-05-2008 01:08 AM
Camouflage of Soviet Tanks spidge Weapons, Technology & Equipment 5 15-09-2006 11:22 PM
The NIH in Italy - Part One- At War Wise1 North Irish Horse 0 22-07-2006 01:15 AM
Indian Headgear simonclarkson Burma & India 4 22-04-2006 06:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:03 AM.
vBSkinworks


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0