More than you ever needed to know about the Jerrycan: jerrycan Now if we can just find a whole site dedicated to those flimsy british tins we've got a set. I didn't know special models were made for water, I'd thought they'd painted a white cross on any old can, but I suppose that just wasn't Ordnung enough for the Wehrmacht. Cheers, Adam.
Special ones for water? You didn't know that. Never bought the Italeri 1/35th jerry cans set? Some of them had the W on them.
Can't find a site about Flimsies Adam but I have a few pictures ! They must actually have been quite efficient for shipping, just not very durable. If you know of any going cheap, give me a shout, won't you ? Rich
You in the market Rich? Sometimes see them at Beltring etc. The Jerrycan must be one of the most successful designs for anything... ever. The one's in Halfords look just the same to me. The Sahariana has to be one of the worst examples of their use though: 24 cans at 20 litres a can (give or take some water) strapped to the side of your open vehicle, in the desert... hmmm. (I have used the Italeri set Owen, I just can't read anything that small. try the Dragon kit ones... nightmarish, multiple different plastic parts along with 3 or 4 etched bits, done a fair few but only 2 properly.)
I'd quite like a 1939 or 1940 dated flimsy. I've never actually "done" Beltring. Always been a bit put off by the cowboy element.
I'm pretty sure you'd enjoy their big bike 'rideout', quite a sight (and sound). That bloke that collects only a particular British bike, all apparently the same, was there this year. He was in a few of the MV magazines recently but I can't remember what the bikes are now. There was something quite pleasing about so many identical looking machines all lined up.
Ah!.... the Jerrican ............................. Humpted may a hundred of those and usually last thing at night. Seem to remember that ones that were kept for water were painted white. I also remember that they used to stack them up into pyramid shape dumps Ron
So there were two types of flimsy: the 'new returnable' and, presumably, the 'old disposable'? Is it worth merging this thread and the other one?
Dam...I passed another bit of info about 200 pages ago regarding the difficulty filling vehicles with fuel from the old cans (esp vehicles with fuel tanks located underneath) and the urgent request for funnels and the allocation being raised from 1 per 5 vehicles to 1 for every vehicle.
WW2 British petrol/water can design can be regarded as a failures for the simple reason that the basic principles of engineering were ignored.The British can was made of "tin can" material designed to be of a sharp cubic shape.The seams which were welded as would be a tin can, were a failure and often leaked due to internal stress generated by the fluid being stored. The obvious answer was to avoid 90 degree seams.That is why you will never find a boiler with a cubic type drum,it will always be to cylindrical shell type with hemispherical ends (ie,designed without 90 degree seams) to minimise the stress created by the internal fluid on the internal surfaces and seams. If you look at the Jerrycan,although having a cubic profile did not possess 90 degree seams.Although having a flatter cubic profile,the design avoided the 90 degree seam and yet was idea for handling,storage and stacking on a vehicle. An example of simple German engineering.
The Flimsy cans were common in Libya, I was working in support of an Oil Seismic exploration company near Darna, to the West of Tobruk. One lot was in what seemed to be a buried cache in a wadi Pic here All available sizes | DSCF2252.jpgresize | Flickr - Photo Sharing! We also found a lot of the later jerry cans with crows feet on them date stamped 1944
Nice shot Algee. Sort of boring to the passing observer ("Why's that loon photographing some rusty boxes?"), but also absolutely fascinating if you like this kind of thing.
The Flimsy cans were common in Libya, I was working in support of an Oil Seismic exploration company near Darna, to the West of Tobruk. One lot was in what seemed to be a buried cache in a wadi Pic here All available sizes | DSCF2252.jpgresize | Flickr - Photo Sharing! We also found a lot of the later jerry cans with crows feet on them date stamped 1944 I would say,the petrol cans were part of a supplies dump which would be known to British patrols.These supply dumps were also a feature of the supply support network for LRDG units.
A Jerrycan, when full, was bloody heavy and was always carried in pairs, i.e. one in each hand. Whenever a 3 ton lorry turned up at your unit fully laden with full cans of petrol then everybody had to muck in until the vehicle was empty. This was the drill wherever you were and I'm sure that records must have been set up as to how long it took to empty a truck of fuel. The "Flimsies" were a waste of time, but the cans themselves, when emptied of fuel, were much used as cooking utensils. Ron
As I recall - it took around 45 jerry cans of fuel to fill both tanks of the Churchill Tank -and it took four men - two on the truck - two on the tanks - and the truck driver "supervising- Tank Commander at order group ....even then we had to changeover as the two on the truck had to lift and carry each one ! As the Churchill only did four gallons to the mile - ( yes that's right - 4 GPM ) - it had to be refilled every day - we had muscles in our eyebrows even- then the guns had to be cleaned - and the clutch- brakes - steering brakes etc adjusted and engine cleaned- tracks checked - bogies greased - THEN go and fight I don't know where the time went Cheers
Always complaining, always complaining! At least you had the privilege of going into battle sitting. And the fact that you were the object of the attention of every gun the Tedeschi had must have done wonders to your youthful ego