Dismiss Notice

You must be 18 or over to participate here.
Dismiss this notice to declare that you are 18+.

Anyone below 18 years of age choosing to dishonestly dismiss this message is accepting the consequences of their own actions.
WW2Talk.Com will not approve of, or be held responsible, for your choices.

Why is there no forensic evidence of the Holocaust? (There is plenty of forensic & other evidence)

Discussion in 'The Holocaust' started by Anynameworks, Jun 28, 2025.

  1. Anynameworks

    Anynameworks Banned

    Post it, if it is evidence that millions were exterminated. What are you waiting for?
     
  2. Anynameworks

    Anynameworks Banned

    This, instead of supporting the study. Are you also unable to analyze a study? This one is incredibly straightforward.
     
  3. JimHerriot

    JimHerriot Ready for Anything

    So you didn't read it the first time I posted it in the thread for you and you can't find it now.

    But have you even looked? It requires reading the thread. And as I told you before, you have to learn to stand on your own two feet. No spoonfeeding. Horses to water and all that.

    Jim.
     
    CL1 and ltdan like this.
  4. JimHerriot

    JimHerriot Ready for Anything

    Haven't you grasped yet that those old copies of the Journal of Historical Review that you persist in quoting from and passing off as your own transient thought were de-bunked years ago. The provence of eejits who were at least prepared to accept that they were holocaust deniers.

    Take them back to the thrift store where you found them. Enlighten yourself. In between the reading lessons of course.

    Jim.
     
    ltdan likes this.
  5. Anynameworks

    Anynameworks Banned

    I am on the side of critical thinking. Why won't you provide evidence (besides claims) of your claims?

    Testimony in the complete absence of evidence is what makes the Holocaust fantastical. You don't dissappear the remains of millions. The absurd claim that the remains are at the camps is beyond belief. They claim something that is easily verifiable, and don't bother to verify it.

    Just call anyone evil who dares ask why one would make such claims. Why didn't they say they must have dumped it in the ocean? That is far more believable than, it's "here", trust me.
     
  6. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer Pearl Harbor Myth Buster

    And yet you can't even give us a link. Perhaps if you moved those hemorrhoids you could see better?
     
    CL1 and JimHerriot like this.
  7. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer Pearl Harbor Myth Buster

    Hemorrhoids again.
     
    JimHerriot likes this.
  8. Anynameworks

    Anynameworks Banned

    Omg...and go on and on about the gas chambers these great engineers never bothered to build. Well designed, efficient gas chambers for lice, but hell....showers will work fine for millions of people. 11,000,000 I believe, according to the Wannsee minutes. Showers. Yeah. Right.

    And I'm evil for noticing these absurd claims.
     
  9. JimHerriot

    JimHerriot Ready for Anything

    Screenshot_20250630-173716.jpg

    Critical thinking eh? Not going too well is it? Solved any problems, or just hoping to cause some?

    And again, you are the last person anyone is likely to trust.

    Jim.
     
    Chris C and ltdan like this.
  10. ltdan

    ltdan Nietenzähler

    We have now finally arrived at pigeon chess: 00.jpg
     
    4jonboy, Rich Payne, cjd_101 and 4 others like this.
  11. cjd_101

    cjd_101 Junior Member

    This thread is as fascinating as it is disturbing. Evidence of the organised and systematic destruction of human beings by the Nazi state and its appendages is not difficult to locate and is well catalogued in Russian, US, German, UK and other national archives. Trying to focus on the whereabouts of the remains of six million victims is poor sophistry. As if all six million were slaughtered at a single place and neatly catalogued by the Sonderkommando or Einsatzgruppen is a farcical suggestion. Focusing on what chemical residues remains on walls is just a red-herring - the Nazis blew-up huge parts of the greater Auschwitz camp before evacuating it, perhaps focus on how much survived such destruction and ask why they felt the need to destroy "de-lousing" (your words) chambers? Perhaps the last words should be left to the former Camp Commandant who is said to have boasted that "Our system is so terrible that no man in this world will believe it to be possible...... the world will brand him a fantastic liar and nobody will believe him!" Alas, I am sure that will not be the last word :-(
     
    Chris C, davidbfpo and JimHerriot like this.
  12. JimHerriot

    JimHerriot Ready for Anything

    "Another group of people who approve Holocaust denial consists of those driven by antisemitic obsessions, extreme nationalists, and all sorts of proponents of the prewar and wartime regimes that collaborated with the Third Reich.
    Also vulnerable to these views are groups of people that know history poorly or not at all, and who happen to come across revisionist propaganda by chance."


    And which are you? I'm thinking, critically of course, the latter.

    Jim
     
    Chris C likes this.
  13. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer Pearl Harbor Myth Buster

    No, just abysmally stupid.
     
  14. Anynameworks

    Anynameworks Banned

    I have seen no gas chambers. Perhaps they exist or did at one time. Without evidence of them, and in light of the explanation that showers were used for gassing people, I assume there were none.

    I know nothing of the capacity of the crematoriums.

    I do not doubt the capacity for evil that humans are capable of. Hell, we starved a million Germans after the war....for what? Idk, just for grins? I don't know. Perhaps we found it necessary. Have they told us why we did it?

    I know from a pilot what they were told the singular goal was at Dresden. That is evil as fuck. Not on nearly the same scale, but damned evil nonetheless. But that's just eyewitness testimony. Perhaps there really were military targets. Perhaps they were met with military resistance. Perhaps it wasn't really a cultural center overflowing with refugees. Perhaps the war wasn't basically already won. Perhaps it was a brilliant and necessary strategic military maneuver. Idk.
     
  15. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer Pearl Harbor Myth Buster

    Anypantieswilldo should investigate:

    The International Military Tribunal (IMT) was a court established by the Allied forces after World War II to prosecute prominent members of the political and military leadership of Nazi Germany for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes against peace. It is best known for the Nuremberg trials, which were held in Nuremberg, Germany, from 1945 to 1946.
    upload_2025-6-30_13-7-54.jpeg
    Here's a more detailed explanation:
    • Establishment:
      The IMT was established by the London Agreement of August 8, 1945, signed by the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union.
    • Purpose:
      The IMT was created to prosecute and punish the "major war criminals of the European Axis".
    • Key Trials:
      The most well-known IMT trial is the one held in Nuremberg, where 24 of the most important political and military leaders of Nazi Germany were tried.
    • Indictments:
      Defendants were charged with crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
    • Significance:
      The IMT was a landmark event in international law, holding individuals accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. It also established important precedents for international criminal law and the prosecution of war criminals.
    • Nuremberg's Significance:
      Nuremberg was chosen as the location for the trial due to its symbolic importance in Nazi Germany, where the Nazi party held its rallies and the Nuremberg Laws were enacted. The courtroom in Nuremberg was also one of the few that survived the Allied bombings relatively intact.
    • Legacy:
      The IMT and the Nuremberg trials have had a lasting impact on international law and the pursuit of justice for war crimes. They paved the way for the establishment of subsequent international criminal tribunals, such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and the International Criminal Court (ICC).
     
    JimHerriot likes this.
  16. Anynameworks

    Anynameworks Banned

    I have read link after link. All filled with claims and zero evidence.

    What exactly is this evidence and what does it provide evidence of? Surely you can at least say what it is and how it links to the extermination of millions.
     
  17. Anynameworks

    Anynameworks Banned

    Lol, so I am stupid for noticing absurd claims?
     
  18. JimHerriot

    JimHerriot Ready for Anything

    Tack changing again? Wind must be up (or you're getting the wind up).

    Goalposts moved?

    Now you're making a mockery (if I send you the wool will you make me one too?)

    Critically thinking of course.

    Jim.
     
  19. JimHerriot

    JimHerriot Ready for Anything

    More likely stupid for saying they're absurd claims.

    Can't be denied, critically thinking of course.

    And how's your "trust me" edict going? Any new takers? Any new recruits?

    Jim.
     
  20. Anynameworks

    Anynameworks Banned

    Seriously? Because group A believes X, if I believe X, I am in group A.

    As I said, logic was exterminated. It appears ypu may have been a victim. Hopefully, you were just desperate for a different approach. Still....
     

Share This Page