20th Division 1945

Discussion in 'Burma & India' started by zahonado, Jun 11, 2014.

  1. davidbfpo

    davidbfpo Patron Patron

  2. davidbfpo

    davidbfpo Patron Patron

    Laochra Beag and dryan67 like this.
  3. dryan67

    dryan67 Senior Member

    Laochra Beag likes this.
  4. Laochra Beag

    Laochra Beag Active Member

    From the little I have read I think that SEAC and 20th Div CO would have been far happier handing over FIC over if the French were fully committed to self rule. However with the Chinese policies of plundering resources and allowing Viet Minh free rein in North, any British counter-insurgency successes, which btw I agree they were FAR better in the jungle than any other forces in-theatre including the Japanese, would have merely postponed the inevitable.

    The French never would or could commit sufficient manpower and equipment to supressing the VM; and their operations were based on false (overly optimistic) view of the opposition. Then we mustn't forget that until the Chinese openly joined the Korean War, the State Dept. put significant pressure of French not to use modern US weapon systems - Airlift capacity, artillery, helicopters, shipping and logistical support. Finally the voters wouldn't support conscripts being deployed, hence the numbers of colonial forces used. This was a conflict with only one outcome.
     
    dryan67 likes this.
  5. davidbfpo

    davidbfpo Patron Patron

    The paper added in Post 81 by William Crane was an essay entered in a competition by the UK-based Society for Army Historical Research (SAHR) and slightly edited:
    Link which dates submission as March 2021: Essay Contest Honours Army Historical Research - Oundle School

    Reviewing the bibliography I recognise some of cited sources, though not two I used (Dunn & Marston) and many of the others are new to me. I may try contact the author via his school.
     
    Laochra Beag likes this.
  6. Laochra Beag

    Laochra Beag Active Member

    Colour me intrigued.
     

Share This Page