Dismiss Notice

You must be 18 or over to participate here.
Dismiss this notice to declare that you are 18+.

Anyone below 18 years of age choosing to dishonestly dismiss this message is accepting the consequences of their own actions.
WW2Talk.Com will not approve of, or be held responsible, for your choices.

Hetzer and the Stug-3

Discussion in 'Weapons, Technology & Equipment' started by chipm, Jan 7, 2026.

  1. chipm

    chipm Well-Known Member

    Did it become a thing of economics and the Hetzer was easier and cheaper to produce.
    They were pretty similar, weren't they.?
    Thank you
     
    JimHerriot likes this.
  2. Chris C

    Chris C Canadian

    I think that the Hetzer was a way to better use the production of the Czech Skoda factory (I think) as the components were based on previous Czech tanks, and thus did not require as extensive retooling as would be needed by completely changing what was being made there.

    It was never a question of one or the other.
     
  3. chipm

    chipm Well-Known Member

    10-4
    Thank You
     
    JimHerriot likes this.
  4. steelers708

    steelers708 Junior Member

    After the Alkett factory was hit in a bombing raid it was decided that to make up for the lost production capacity BMM in Prague was assessed as an alternative production plant, unfortunately the lifting capacity at BMM, used to the 9.5ton Pzkpfw 38(t), was not capable of lifting the 24ton of a completed StuG III. Therefore designs for what eventually became the Jagdpanzer 38(t) were drawn up in December 1943 and the first vehicles were completed in March 1944, Skoda at Pilsen joined in production and completed their first vehicles in July 1944.
     
    Dave55, chipm and JimHerriot like this.
  5. Jonathan Ball

    Jonathan Ball It's a way of life.

    Spotted online. A StuG III G has been discovered recently at Nordholz near Cuxhaven. It seems in remarkable condition.

    IMG_7843.jpeg

    IMG_7844.jpeg
     
    Nick the Noodle and bofors like this.

Share This Page