I'm doing a history project where I compare and contrast these two articles. Im finding many differences, but I'm having trouble coming up with any similarities between the two accounts. I don't expect anyone to read through these as they're rather long, but can anyone think of any generalized similarities I might look look for in WW2 memoirs? One is about an infantry soldier, Charles Cawthon in St. Lo and the other is about Hughes Rudd who was a liasion pilot who spotted enemy artillery. Any input would be appreciated. https://www.homeworkmarket.com/sites/default/files/qx/16/04/31/07/st._lo_0.pdf When I Landed The War Was Over | American History Lives at American Heritage
If they are personal memoirs, then I know from experience of reading and hearing WW2 veterans that there tend to be common traits such as the reaction to seeing the first casualties (especially mutilated dead bodies) and things like smells and noises. Smells of dead animals and bodies and the sound of grown men suffering agonising pain. That's the very sad and depressing aspect of front line War. Of course, the more positive traits include the incredible camaraderie built over time by those lucky enough to survive. Note: obviously depends on context. I'm talking about front line British tank crew in North West Europe. Note: your two examples are fulfilling completely different roles so their experiences will have been totally different. The infantry guy will have seen things 'close up' while the airman will most likely have only seen things at 'arms length'.
